CHICKEN JUSTICE - A Case Study in Excommunication

Protector - Kahunas Still Refuse to Disclose Contents of Secret Report

Why does the Auxiliary Board Member for Protection for ____ County refuse to make available to Ms.W the report on her that was fabricated and disseminated through Baha'i Administration? but never to her? Because:

1. The content was gathered illegally.

2. The content was solicited by pressure from the AB.

3. The content was created by assumptions of fact from gossip and backbiting.

4. The content was at least partially the result of the lust of some of the Baha'i men, who desired to control Ms.W since they could not have her.

5. The content was a crazy quilt of bits and pieces of personal and confidential items that Ms.W had once shared with the Local Spiritual Assembly.

6. The content was mischief stirred up by Assistants to the ABM in an effort to hide their incompetence.

7. Were the report given to her, she might be able to sue. The slander that this "investigation" provoked went outside the Baha'i Community and affected her publicly.

8. The report no longer exists. The AB saw prudent to destroy it.

9. The report exists, but would be presented to Ms.W in altered form. This action would underscore the AB's classification of a person so dangerous to the community that she could not be trusted to see it. It also attests to the insanity of the ABM in hiding the report at all, as well as their insanity in trying to get away with it in the first place.

10. The AB knows the report was gathered under false pretenses and the information within it is spurious. Were this fact to be leaked, the Assistant and the Members and other officers involved would (hopefully) suffer the removal of their rights. Evidently the House of Justice believes these men are infallible.

12.As long as the Institutions of the Faith continue to grant these men outrageous license to destroy the reputation of an innocent woman, so long is the entire structure of Baha'i Administration poised to shatter.

13. Ms. W unwittingly caused a prominent Baha'i to believe that she had something on him. In his post as Auxiliary Board Member, he was loathe to admit whatever the shortcoming was, and considered Ms.W's knowledge dangerous enough to excommunicate her immediately.

If the report is true, there is no reason not to reveal it. But it has been kept secret, and we have no doubt whatsoever that it is false. But the Baha'i community has been trained to regard secrecy as administration's sole perrogative. Questions are not asked, because questioning is followed by excommunication.

We are beginning to survey the camp of ex-Baha'is who attest to the corruption within Baha'i Administration, and the air over there is fresh and clean. The facts speak for themselves. The "infallible" Universal House of Justice, as it calls itself, has created a system that allows corruption to rise to the top and purity to be trampled beneath.

It seems that he closer one's heart is to its administration, the greater the risk to be expelled. E.g., Mason Remey put all his money on the Guardian. Fate removed Shoghi Effendi before he could set up the safeguards around Remey to succeed him. The highest ranking Baha'is revised Shoghi Effendi's written statements and expelled him - but not before waging a vicious smear campaign against him that set the Baha'i community back a hundred years.

The immense, creaking man-made structure of today's Baha'i administration is built on that most dishonorable deed. In Christian terms, it is built on sinking sand.

WHAT WAS THE SECRET THE AUXILIARY BOARD MEMBER WAS HIDING?
PROTECTION OF THE FAITH - TASTES LIKE CHICKEN!